October 11, 2021
Maya Ortiz de Montellano, CFA, Senior Investment Analyst
Key takeaways
- The digital asset ecosystem has taken several quantum leaps forward since the creation of bitcoin in 2009, and cryptocurrency is now widely considered a viable investable asset. Novel utilities associated with the technology have been discovered, the global cryptocurrency market capitalization has skyrocketed, and there have been marked changes in the quality of digital asset offerings and institutional participation.
- This topical report endeavors to first discuss the essential factors that investors should contemplate while seeking exposure to cryptocurrencies. It will then explore the various entities through which institutional investors may gain access to digital assets, while also highlighting the primary differentiators and drawbacks of each method.
- Without an exchange-traded fund (ETF) approved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), investors seeking exposure to digital assets may either make a direct purchase through a crypto exchange or gain indirect access via mutual fund derivatives, a grantor trust, or a private placement fund.
Principal criteria for investment
In weighing whether to make an investment in bitcoin directly, or through a registered fund that uses derivatives such as futures, a grantor trust, or a private placement vehicle, investors should keep a few considerations top of mind:
- Ability to closely track the price of the underlying asset
- Impact of premium / discount on investment outcome
- Protection against hacking/cyber-theft
- Fees and operating expenses
- Liquidity
Digital asset investment offerings
This segment of the report aims to analyze the various institutional cryptocurrency products mentioned above, with an emphasis on the first four principal criteria for investment. Liquidity, the fifth key component when evaluating such vehicles, will then be compared across the different methods in the following section.
Direct exposure
Coinbase’s direct listing in April represented the first time a digital exchange went public in the U.S. Its market capitalization, which currently exceeds $59 billion (as of 9/30/2021)1 , underscores the disruptive potential of such platforms and illustrates investor appetite for the space. Investing directly in bitcoin through cryptocurrency exchanges provides investors with the purest form of ownership among the aforementioned mechanisms.
However, it also introduces numerous potential risks. Such exchanges have proven vulnerable to hacking and cyber-theft. For instance, between 2011 and 2014, 650,0002 bitcoins were stolen from Mt. Gox, a Japanese cryptocurrency exchange that was then the largest in the world. More recently, hackers were able to withdraw over 7,000 bitcoins from Binance, currently the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange.3 Such attacks highlight the importance of cold storage, discussed later in the report, and the susceptibility of digital exchanges to breaches.
Even when digital exchanges successfully evade hacks, investors can lose access to their cryptocurrencies if they do not properly store or remember the public and private keys associated with their wallet. Given the decentralized nature of the platforms and their cryptographic security features, password recovery infrastructure is often infeasible. According to The New York Times, around 20%4 of the existing bitcoin supply appears to be lost or otherwise stranded in wallets. Further exacerbating this risk, many platforms either have very limited or entirely nonexistent customer service capabilities -- delaying responses in the event of crises. For example, the Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have received 11,000 customer complaints against Coinbase since 2016, the majority of which relate to customer service.5
Finally, these platforms have substantial frictional costs associated with transactions and transfer of assets.
Indirect exposure
Mutual funds, grantor trusts, and private placement funds are all vehicles through which investors can indirectly access the digital asset sphere. While certain attributes differ meaningfully across the approaches, a few commonalities also exist. Notably, each structure appears to solve most of the issues surrounding accessibility that are present in digital wallets -- individual investors do not need to manage public and private keys. Additionally, the mechanisms are familiar to most investors, don’t require the creation of an additional wallet, and tend to have more extensive customer service capabilities. These factors have the potential to mitigate many of the initial fears individuals have when considering an allocation to this brand-new asset class.
Mutual Funds
Mutual funds use futures, which are cash settled, in an attempt to replicate the price action of cryptocurrencies. More specifically, these funds typically invest in front-end futures contracts. The vehicles then begin the roll process, whereby they exchange a purchased expiring contract for a new longer-dated contract. Thus, such offerings do not own the underlying asset itself -- in this case Bitcoin. However, this approach can be inefficient from taxation and transaction cost standpoints. Additionally, these funds often have tracking error (the extent to which a Fund’s returns differ from the Index), and do not precisely mirror the price of Bitcoin. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expressed caution around these new funds, as there are outstanding questions about the depth and breadth of the Bitcoin (BTC) futures market, and its ability to accommodate daily liquidity requirements of registered mutual funds, or ETFs.6 Finally, the volatility in the price of Bitcoin referenced by the futures contracts may introduce further imprecision.
Grantor Trust
The first stop for many investors who want to buy digital assets such as Bitcoin is to invest in a grantor trust, which is a structure commonly used to hold single commodities (ex. Gold, Silver). Grantor trusts for cryptocurrency assets generally trade in the over-the-counter (OTC) market, and are a flow through structure like a limited partnership for tax purposes. Additionally, grantor trusts are typically IRA eligible. These structures provide exposure to single commodities and are not registered under the Investment Company Act. A grantor trust net asset value (NAV) for Bitcoin may at times trade at a premium or discount to the underlying asset for substantial periods of time. For example, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) reached a premium of 122.3% on June, 2017, and a low of -17.9% in May, 2021.7 While a premium or discount could conceivably be beneficial, if timed perfectly, the reality is that it most likely makes buying a highly volatile asset like Bitcoin risker. Finally, the fees associated with such vehicles have the potential to be prohibitive for many investors.
Private Placement
Unlike mutual funds and grantor trusts, a private placement for bitcoin offers qualified investors the opportunity to transact at a net asset value (NAV) of a fund that directly corresponds to the price of bitcoin at a specific point in time (for example, 4 p.m. ET). Keeping in mind that digital assets actually trade 24 hours, 7 days a week, transacting at NAV still permits a strategy such as dollar cost averaging to better reflect the true economic performance of the underlying asset. The traceability and accuracy associated with this type of fund served as key differentiators during the vetting process of the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Regarding security, the highest level of protection against hacking for the time being is referred to as cold storage. This means the encrypted private key data that permits transacting in bitcoin (or any digital asset) is stored on a hardware module which is never connected to a routable network. The most secure cold storage facilities are redundant, geographically dispersed with physical barriers to entry, electronic surveillance, and patrols. The private placement selected by Global Manager Research meets this standard.
Fees and operating expenses for cryptocurrency asset investment structures vary widely (0.30%-2.0%), but passive exposure to a single digital asset does not warrant management fees on par with private equity or hedge funds.
Liquidity…it depends.
If the definition of a liquid asset is that it can easily be converted into cash within a short period of time, Global Manager Research would suggest that Bitcoin falls in the relatively liquid category. Transactions in Bitcoin through digital exchanges can be executed in a market that trades constantly, while mutual funds are open-ended vehicles. However, exchange markets remain fragmented and can hinder accurate price discovery. Additionally, there are concerns about the depth and reliability of BTC futures, the products used by mutual funds. Next, indirect investments in cryptocurrency through grantor trusts and private placement funds typically have restrictions surrounding redemptions and subscriptions. Ultimately, the more liquid markets may come at the cost of sub-standard price accuracy and transparency. Conversely, private placements funds face liquidity restrictions that prevent seamlessly trading in and out of the underlying assets.
Rapidly Evolving Landscape
Looking to the future, Global Manager Research expects that cryptocurrency assets will no longer be the domain of technologists, with the number of investment offerings growing, including passive and actively managed options. The floodgate for this will likely require further development of a regulatory framework coming from U.S. regulators, and further cooperation across industry participants. With that view, a Bitcoin ETF is inevitable, in our opinion, but timing is highly uncertain. Absent any changes in current Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax guidance, we expect to eventually see a pathway to transition interests from a private placement fund into an ETF in a tax-efficient manner.
1 https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/COIN (data as of 9/30/21).
2 https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/bitcoin-gox/ “Twice Burned –How Mt. Gox’s bitcoin customers could lose again” by Alexander Harney and Steve Stecklow (November 16, 2017).
3 https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/08/binance-bitcoin-hack-over-40-million-of-cryptocurrency-stolen.html “Hackers steal over $40 million worth of bitcoin from one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges” by Arjun Kharpel (May 7, 2019).
4 New York Times: “Tens of billions worth of Bitcoin have been locked by people who forgot their key” by Nicholas Albrecht (January 13, 2021).
5 https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/24/coinbase-slammed-for-terrible-customer-service-after-hackers-drain-user-accounts/ “Coinbase slammed for what users say is terrible customer service after hackers drain their accounts” by Scott Zamost, Eamon Javers, Jennifer Schlesinger, Stephen Council, Angelica Serrano-Roman (August 24, 2021).
6 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, “Staff Letter on Funds Registered Under the Investment Company Act Investing in the Bitcoin Futures Market” (May 11, 2021)
7 Cointelegraph: “GBTC unlock edges closer as impact on Bitcoin price remains unclear” by Anirudh Tiwari (Jul 10, 2021).
Risk Factors
Global Manager Research of Wells Fargo Investment Institute is not a legal or tax advisor.
All investing involves risk including the possible loss of principal. There is no assurance any investment strategy will be successful. An investment in a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund will fluctuate and shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Exchange-Traded funds are subject to risks similar to those of stocks and may yield investment results that, before expenses, generally correspond to the price and yield of a particular index. There is no assurance that the price and yield performance of the index can be fully matched.
Virtual or cryptocurrency is not a physical currency, nor is it legal tender. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are a very speculative investment and involves a high degree of risk. Investors must have the financial ability, sophistication/experience and willingness to bear the risks of an investment, and a potential total loss of their investment. Cryptocurrency has limited operating history or performance. Fees and expenses associated with a cryptocurrency investment may be substantial. Cryptocurrencies are sometimes exchanged for U.S. dollars or other currencies around the world, but they are not backed or supported by any government or central bank. Their value is completely derived by market forces of supply and demand, and they are more volatile than traditional fiat currencies.
The use of derivatives, such as futures, options, swaps and forwards, can expose the investor to additional risk. Derivatives generally have implied leverage which can magnify volatility and may entail other risks such as market, interest rate, credit, counterparty and management risks which may hurt a fund’s performance. Counterparty risk is the risk that the other party to the agreement will default at some time during the life of the contract. Investing in derivatives carries the risk of the underlying instrument as well as the derivative itself and may not be successful, resulting in losses to the Fund, and the cost of such strategies may also reduce the Fund’s returns.
Private capital funds are complex, speculative investment vehicles and are not appropriate for all investors. They are generally open to qualified investors only and carry high costs, substantial risks, and may be highly volatile. There is often limited (or even non‐existent) liquidity and a lack of transparency regarding the underlying assets. They do not represent a complete investment program. The investment returns may fluctuate and are subject to market volatility, so that an investor's shares, when redeemed or sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Private capital funds are not required to provide investors with periodic pricing or valuation and are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds. Investing in private capital funds may also involve tax consequences. Speak to your tax advisor before investing. An investment in a private capital fund involves the risks inherent in an investment in securities, as well as specific risks associated with limited liquidity, the use of leverage and illiquid investments. There can be no assurances that a manager's strategy will be successful or that a manager will use these strategies with respect to all or any portion of a portfolio. Please carefully review the Confidential Private Placement Memorandum or other offering documents for complete information regarding terms, including all applicable fees, as well as other factors you should consider before investing.
Global Manager Research (“GMR”) is a division of Wells Fargo Investment Institute, Inc. (“WFII”). WFII is a registered investment adviser and wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a bank affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company.
The information in this report was prepared by Global Manager Research (“GMR”). Opinions represent GMR’s opinion as of the date of this report and are for general information purposes only and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally. GMR does not undertake to advise you of any change in its opinions or the information contained in this report. Wells Fargo & Company affiliates may issue reports or have opinions that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, this report. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. GMR may provide research analysis for Wells Fargo affiliated mutual funds, private funds and other products, which may also be advised by WFII or a Wells Fargo affiliate (“Wells Fargo”). GMR collects research fees from a Wells Fargo advisory affiliate for due diligence conducted on nonaffiliated products. GMR may be consulted by product managers, including advisory affiliates of WFII, in order to provide insight and guidance into product creation and management. The analysis utilizes the same processes and scrutiny as for non-affiliated products and WFII is committed to providing research that is fair and unbiased, but a conflict may arise as Wells Fargo may benefit from a favorable recommendation for an affiliated product.
The information contained herein constitutes general information and is not directed to, designed for, or individually tailored to, any particular investor or potential investor. This report is not intended to be a client-specific suitability or best interest analysis or recommendation, an offer to participate in any investment, or a recommendation to buy, hold or sell securities. Do not use this report as the sole basis for investment decisions. Do not select an asset class or investment product based on performance alone. Consider all relevant information, including your existing portfolio, investment objectives, risk tolerance, liquidity needs and investment time horizon. The material contained herein has been prepared from sources and data we believe to be reliable but we make no guarantee to its accuracy or completeness.
GMR uses qualitative and quantitative methods to assess investment products to develop due diligence opinions. In general, due diligence opinions entail a thorough assessment of an investment product and the assignment of one of five assessment recommendations: Recommended, Watch, Supported, Sell or Sunset. GMR may change an investment product’s assessment recommendation from time to time. GMR due diligence assessments are generally described as: “Recommended”, where assessment criteria indicate an investment product is in good standing and GMR has high conviction in it. “Recommended: Watch Level I", where an event has occurred and is being evaluated. Pending the outcome of the evaluation, GMR maintains its recommendation for new purchases. "Recommended: Watch Level II", where an event has occurred that may have the potential to impact longer term investment prospects and is being evaluated. Pending the outcome of the evaluation, GMR maintains its recommendation for new purchases. "Watch Level III", where an event has occurred that has elevated concern regarding this product's longer term investment prospects. GMR recommends restricting new flows into the product until our evaluation is complete. “Supported” where a product is in good standing and is considered acceptable to own. “Sell” where assessment criteria indicate an investment product is recommended for exit in the near-term; and “Sunset” where assessment criteria indicate an investment product should be exited over an appropriate period of time as determined by the client’s specific situation.
Wells Fargo Advisors is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, but is not licensed or registered with any financial services regulatory authority outside of the U.S. Non-U.S. residents who maintain U.S.-based financial services account(s) with Wells Fargo Advisors may not be afforded certain protections conferred by legislation and regulations in their country of residence in respect of any investments, investment transactions or communications made with Wells Fargo Advisors.
Wells Fargo Advisors is a trade name used by Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC, Members SIPC, separate registered broker-dealers and non-bank affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company.