Institute Alert

Wells Fargo Investment Institute strategists provide insights on this week’s market volatility and guidance for what may be ahead.

April 29, 2019

Paul Christopher, CFA, Head of Global Market Strategy

Sameer Samana, CFA , Global Equity and Technical Strategist

What to Do With a Neutral Outlook

Key takeaways

  • We believe that a U.S. economic recession is unlikely in the next 12 months, and potentially longer—while somewhat stronger growth seems set to emerge in the second half of 2019. International economic growth remains slow, however, and recent data suggest a delayed growth rebound in Europe and Japan.
  • We find many asset classes that appear to have upside opportunities over the next 12 months but that seem extended in the near term. Consequently, we have adopted a neutral position for many asset classes.

What it may mean for investors

  • This report offers guidance on steps that investors can consider when the tactical (6-18 months ahead) outlook is neutral.

Download the report (PDF)

So far this year, we have taken guidance to neutral for a variety of equity, fixed income, and real asset classes.1 One point of emphasis is that neutral is not a negative outlook, and we believe there are steps investors can take to manage portfolios under neutral conditions.

Q: Recession or no recession? Have the odds changed significantly?

The U.S. economy has slowed from last year, but we view the probability of a recession as below 50% in the next 12 months. After a weak start to the year, the labor market and consumer spending are recovering. We expect these factors—along with low inflation—to support moderate growth into 2020. We also believe that the Federal Reserve (Fed) has ended its rate-hiking cycle, a move that should add support to the economy.

With this combination of slow growth, low inflation, and low long-term interest rates, it is tempting to say that 2019 is like 2016 to 2017. But this comparison has a glaring weakness. Unlike 2017, global economic growth today is not synchronized, especially in Europe and Japan, where contracting global trade restrains manufacturing and capital spending. The timing of these countries’ economic recovery is uncertain and depends on still-incomplete U.S.-China trade negotiations. The main risk might be that trade fails to gain new momentum, pushes European and Japanese economies into recession, and dents U.S. overseas earnings. A rapid strengthening of the U.S. dollar could presage this risk.

Q: What should investors make of the strong equity rallies so far this year?

Global equities rose by more than 13% in the first quarter of 2019, led by Information Technology, Real Estate, Industrials, Energy, and Consumer Discretionary, even as broader economic growth decelerated. A combination of factors lifted investor sentiment, including relief that a recession does not appear imminent, the Fed’s move to stop raising interest rates, and new hope for positive outcomes from U.S.-China trade talks and Brexit negotiations.

Our April 24, 2019 report, noted above, discussed in detail why we expect steady 2019 profit margins for most U.S. firms, and why positive global earnings growth and somewhat higher valuations are likely by year-end. Nevertheless, we are neutral on the S&P 500 Index, because the index has returned to fair value amid significant near-term risks. Market volatility remains likely if: (i) the weak international data persist and suggest a spillover to other regions, or (ii) U.S.-China trade negotiations disappoint investors.

Q: How is a neutral equity view consistent with a sector bent toward cyclicals?

Our recent equity sector weighting changes align with the outlook for moderate U.S. economic growth—but volatility from sluggish international growth. As the U.S. economy steadies after a difficult start to the year, we favor increasing allocations to growth-oriented cyclical sectors. Our recent guidance upgrades emphasize the sectors with the highest forecasted 12-month forward earnings growth, while our downgrades reflect less favorable fundamentals. Still, our outlook for moderate U.S. growth—and the risk from sluggish growth and policy disappointments overseas—have led us to a greater emphasis on quality considerations among sectors, including low leverage, high profitability, and low earnings volatility. Stronger liquidity and debt management should soften the portfolio impact of the anticipated global equity market volatility.

Q: We are neutral on large- and mid-cap equities, neutral on intermediate- and long-term fixed income, and neutral on commodities. What is there for investors to do with so many neutral ratings?

We believe that investors should consider taking several steps:

As U.S. large caps move higher or lower, adjust holdings to maintain a neutral position. A neutral equity position does not mean liquidating equity holdings but, instead, taking steps to maintain one’s strategic or long-term target allocation in the face of market volatility. A neutral position accommodates rebalancing, which is a proactive strategy to manage risk. Rebalancing means taking some profits as equity prices exceed targets, and then reinvesting the proceeds in favored markets or sectors. Investors can reallocate cash to more favored markets or sectors in increments, either at regular intervals or as prices fall by designated percentages. In this environment, cash managed in this disciplined way can be a useful tool.

Exploit the gradations in our asset class guidance. U.S. large- and mid-cap equities look neutral as a group, but we have a most favorable view on emerging market equities and an unfavorable view on U.S. small caps. An investor could rebalance toward neutral in U.S. large- and mid-cap equities, in order to increase diversification and exposure toward emerging markets.

Even within the universe of large-cap equities, investors can follow our sector preferences. Specifically, we recently upgraded Information Technology and Energy, at the expense of Financials, Materials, and Health Care. This combination allows for rebalancing to the more favored sectors from the less favored. We also believe that the upgrades reinforce the quality of an equity position (see below).

We recently upgraded intermediate- and long-term fixed income from unfavorable to neutral. Managing these neutral positions depends on the investor’s objective but, in broad strokes, some adjustments over time can help to target a more neutral position in intermediate and longer-term bonds:

  • Rather than selling individual bonds (a potentially expensive proposition) to buy those with longer maturities, an investor who owns individual bonds can simply look to buy longer-term bonds with existing cash, or as holdings mature.
  • An investor that owns managed investments, such as mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, or separately managed investments with a short-term duration profile could target a manager with a neutral duration profile (our current position).2

Focus on quality. Corporate cash and healthy debt levels become especially important as an economic expansion matures, and rising debt levels become a risk to the economy. In equities, we favor reallocating between sectors based on quality factors. In fixed income, currently low interest rates may drive investors to assets with compelling yields—but which also have greater risk of sharp price declines and market losses. We favor increasing credit quality, and we remain unfavorable on high-yield debt.

Q: What could lead us to be more favorable on the broad S&P 500 Index?

In order to move from neutral back toward favorable, we need to see better value in markets and more alignment between sentiment and the economic backdrop. That is, we would need to see the eventual stabilization in global economic growth that we expect—and also a pullback in equities that enables meaningful appreciation toward our 12-month targets.

1 Please see Institute Alert, “Adjusting for the Gap between Sentiment and Growth”, April 24, 2019; Institute Alert, “Lower Growth Expectations and Portfolio Implications”, April 4, 2019; Institute Alert, “Changing Guidance and Exposure for an Evolving Slowdown”, March 7, 2019; and Institute Alert, “Reducing Portfolio Risk”, January 31, 2019.

2 Duration is a measure of a bond’s or bond portfolio’s sensitivity to interest rates.

Risk Considerations

Each asset class has its own risk and return characteristics. The level of risk associated with a particular investment or asset class generally correlates with the level of return the investment or asset class might achieve. Stock markets, especially foreign markets, are volatile. Stock values may fluctuate in response to general economic and market conditions, the prospects of individual companies, and industry sectors. Foreign investing has additional risks including those associated with currency fluctuation, political and economic instability, and different accounting standards. These risks are heightened in emerging markets. Small- and mid-cap stocks are generally more volatile, subject to greater risks and are less liquid than large company stocks. Bonds are subject to market, interest rate, price, credit/default, liquidity, inflation and other risks. Prices tend to be inversely affected by changes in interest rates. High yield (junk) bonds have lower credit ratings and are subject to greater risk of default and greater principal risk. The commodities markets are considered speculative, carry substantial risks, and have experienced periods of extreme volatility. Investing in a volatile and uncertain commodities market may cause a portfolio to rapidly increase or decrease in value which may result in greater share price volatility.

Sector Investing

Sector investing can be more volatile than investments that are broadly diversified over numerous sectors of the economy and will increase a portfolio’s vulnerability to any single economic, political, or regulatory development affecting the sector. This can result in greater price volatility. The Energy sector may be adversely affected by changes in worldwide energy prices, exploration, production spending, government regulation, and changes in exchange rates, depletion of natural resources, and risks that arise from extreme weather conditions. Key risks to the Financials sector include maturation of the credit cycle resulting in higher credit losses and tighter lending standards, lower interest rates leading to a reduction in profitability, and capital market weakness reducing assets under management as well as constraints around accessing the markets for growth capital. Some of the risks associated with investment in the Health Care sector include competition on branded products, sales erosion due to cheaper alternatives, research and development risk, government regulations and government approval of products anticipated to enter the market. Materials industries can be significantly affected by the volatility of commodity prices, the exchange rate between foreign currency and the dollar, export/import concerns, worldwide competition, procurement and manufacturing and cost containment issues. Real estate investments have special risks, including possible illiquidity of the underlying properties, credit risk, interest rate fluctuations, and the impact of varied economic conditions. Risks associated with the Technology sector include increased competition from domestic and international companies, unexpected changes in demand, regulatory actions, technical problems with key products, and the departure of key members of management.

Global Investment Strategy (GIS) is a division of Wells Fargo Investment Institute, Inc. (WFII). WFII is a registered investment adviser and wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a bank affiliate of Wells Fargo & Company.

The information in this report was prepared by Global Investment Strategy. Opinions represent GIS’ opinion as of the date of this report and are for general information purposes only and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally. GIS does not undertake to advise you of any change in its opinions or the information contained in this report. Wells Fargo & Company affiliates may issue reports or have opinions that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, this report.

The information contained herein constitutes general information and is not directed to, designed for, or individually tailored to, any particular investor or potential investor. This report is not intended to be a client-specific suitability analysis or recommendation, an offer to participate in any investment, or a recommendation to buy, hold or sell securities. Do not use this report as the sole basis for investment decisions. Do not select an asset class or investment product based on performance alone. Consider all relevant information, including your existing portfolio, investment objectives, risk tolerance, liquidity needs and investment time horizon.

Wells Fargo Advisors is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, but is not licensed or registered with any financial services regulatory authority outside of the U.S. Non-U.S. residents who maintain U.S.-based financial services account(s) with Wells Fargo Advisors may not be afforded certain protections conferred by legislation and regulations in their country of residence in respect of any investments, investment transactions or communications made with Wells Fargo Advisors.

Wells Fargo Advisors is a trade name used by Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC and Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC, Members SIPC, separate registered broker-dealers and non-bank affiliates of Wells Fargo & Company.