Because many executive compensation plans are stock-based, Smith finds that executives are often over-concentrated in one company or industry.
call out “This part of retirement planning for executives can be particularly difficult because there is an emotional attachment to the company they work for and a reluctance to sell.” end call out
“This part of retirement planning for executives can be particularly difficult because there is an emotional attachment to the company they work for and a reluctance to sell,” said Smith.
Even so, executives need to consider balancing their portfolio to avoid taking on too much risk.
Working with an investment professional, there are several strategies that may potentially be considered, including options contracts.
Options contracts, on the other hand, serve as an agreement between two parties that allows the buyer to buy or sell underlying stocks at a predetermined price within a set time.
Of course, Smith stressed, all of this should be done with taxes and overall financial objectives top of mind.
“Ultimately, the executive should plan ahead and understand tax consequences, including timing or state specific considerations, on that compensation," Smith says.
For example, if an executive has plans to relocate to a state with a lower income tax, it may be prudent to hold off on selling shares until they’ve established residence elsewhere, explained Smith. Or if an executive knows that they won’t be getting a large salary in the future, it may be best to wait on selling until then.
Lastly, Smith said that many executive compensation structures open the individual up to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) system, which requires them to calculate their tax liability twice — first, under ordinary income tax rules, then under the AMT — and pay whichever amount is highest.