Fed policy uncertainty and rising bond yields
In our view, several factors are amplifying uncertainty across financial and commodity markets, a dynamic that is likely to persist in the coming weeks and months. We have maintained a cautious outlook heading into the late-summer period, which has historically been a seasonally weaker period of performance for equities, and comes just ahead of the midterm election cycle. Additional potential sources of volatility include second-quarter earnings season and the performance of technology stocks, as investors increasingly focus on profits and the artificial intelligence (AI) impact on productivity rather than the scale of capital spending alone.
We believe another major risk for equity markets is the gap between investor expectations and Fed policy. Two weeks ago, policymakers held interest rates steady while reaffirming their commitment to returning inflation to the 2% target. With inflation above target since early 2021, investors remain focused on how quickly and aggressively the Fed may need to act. Case in point: equity markets initially weakened after Chair Walsh’s post- Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) comments, as investors weighed limited forward guidance and uncertainty around the new leadership’s commitment to the 2% inflation target. A key risk is that rates remain higher for longer, reducing the present value of future earnings and pressuring equity valuations, particularly among AI-related stocks.
As of August 6, Fed funds futures markets were pricing in a 58% chance of a rate hike at the September 6 FOMC meeting, according to Bloomberg, with an additional hike projected through the end of 2027. That would mark a reversal from an easing policy that took place from mid-September 2024 to December 2025, before the current pausing phase.
Rising long-term Treasury yields
We also see rising long-term yields as a significant potential headwind to the current bull market. During the month of July, the 10-year Treasury yield spiked from 4.37% to 4.73%, while the 30-year Treasury remained above 5% and at its highest level since 2007, per Bloomberg. In our view, higher inflation-adjusted yields reflect rising capital needs tied to AI infrastructure, energy investment, and government borrowing to fund large deficits. Rising interest rates can also pressure stocks by raising borrowing costs for consumers, slowing demand and reducing the value investors place on future earnings.
A second implication is that rising bond yields are starting to look competitive with the earnings yield on the S&P 500 Index. The 12-month forward earnings yield on the S&P 500 Index is 4.73% as of July 31 (Bloomberg), about the same as the current 10-year Treasury yield. Thus, for yield-oriented investors, the 10-year Treasury may look as attractive as the S&P 500 Index. Bond yields also are rising in other countries such as Europe and Japan, providing more competition for non-U.S. equities and potentially leading to higher volatility for global equity indexes.
Chart 1 shows that, in the post-COVID period, rising 10-year Treasury yields have often weighed on equity performance, especially when the benchmark yield has moved above 4.5%. The shaded areas identify periods when rising yields appeared to pressure equities: 2023, when the Fed signaled that rates could stay higher for longer; 2024, when hotter inflation data delayed expected Fed rate cuts; 2025, during the “Liberation Day” tariff announcements; and 2026, at the start of the Iran conflict. The current period is also highlighted, showing that although higher yields have once again limited S&P 500 Index gains, equities have remained resilient and avoided a meaningful pullback.
Chart 1. Higher Treasury yields have pressured equity returns 
Sources: Wells Fargo Investment Institute and Bloomberg. Daily data as of August 4, 2026. Yields represent past performance and fluctuate with market conditions. Current yields may be higher or lower than those quoted above. An Index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Shaded regions represent periods when rising U.S. 10-year Treasury yields appeared to coincide with weaker index performance.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
What it means for investors
Long-term Treasury yields have pulled back some after spiking in July and equities have continued climbing to record highs, supported by strong earnings growth, especially in the technology sector.
Still, we believe monetary policy uncertainties, rising long-term yields, and geopolitical tensions are increasing the risk of an equity market pullback just as we’re entering the historically weakest three-month period (August-October) and approach the midterm elections. Sharp increases in bond yields have historically coincided with weaker stock returns, with the speed of yield moves especially important.
The good news is that we think markets will eventually see through these issues, and we reiterate our broader preference for equities over bonds. We do expect Middle East tensions to keep energy prices elevated in the near term, but looking into 2027, we expect lower topline inflation if geopolitical conditions improve and oil prices decline.
To summarize, we expect a healthy but slower economy and some additional inflation, including the growing risk for a Fed-rate hike. In our view, U.S. Large Cap Equities remain our preferred equity exposure in the current investing landscape, along with the Financials, Technology, Materials, and Utilities sectors.
Higher yields do not always mean better opportunities
Long-term Treasury yields are among the highest levels investors have seen in years. At first glance, these yields may appear to offer a worthwhile opportunity to lock in income. However, we believe investors should look beyond headline yields. Income alone does not necessarily imply strong return potential, particularly when longer-maturity bond prices remain highly sensitive to changes in interest rates and other factors, as we describe in the cover story.
As Chart 2 below illustrates, long-term Treasury yields are elevated relative to recent history. Yet yield is only one component of total return. If long-term rates rise further from current levels, price declines could offset much of the income investors receive. The additional yield available from longer maturities appears limited relative to the substantial increase in interest-rate sensitivity associated with these bonds. We believe long-term yields could remain under upward pressure as large government borrowing needs coincide with inflation that remains above the Fed’s 2% target, potentially impacting returns.
Chart 2. 10-year Treasury yields since 2011 
Source: Bloomberg as of August 4, 2026. The 15-year average value for the 10-year Treasury yield was 2.61%. Yields represent past performance and fluctuate with market conditions. Current yields may be higher or lower than those quoted above.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Given these considerations, we do not believe long-term bonds currently offer a compelling risk-reward tradeoff. Accordingly, we maintain an unfavorable view on Long Term Taxable Fixed Income. By contrast, Short Term Taxable Fixed Income, where we are favorable, has significantly less exposure to rising yields. Investors seeking additional income do not necessarily need to look to longer maturities to achieve it. In our view, selectively adding short-term investment-grade credit may provide a more efficient way to enhance portfolio yield. While credit exposure carries its own risks, we currently view those risks as better compensated than the interest rate exposure associated with maturities longer than seven years.
Diversifying with Commodities
Investors often think about portfolio diversification in terms of stock and bond allocations, but recent markets have reinforced the value of adding Commodities that can behave differently when traditional asset classes struggle, especially when the struggle comes from inflation driven by rising commodity prices. Commodities provide exposure to the physical inputs that drive the global economy, including energy, metals, and agricultural products, and their return drivers often differ from those of equities and fixed income. That distinction matters in periods when inflation, higher interest rates, geopolitical shocks, or supply disruptions put pressure on stocks, bonds, or both at the same time.
The diversification case is supported in our recently published 2026 Capital Market Assumptions (CMAs). The correlation matrix used in the CMAs shows that Commodities have a negative correlation with U.S. Investment-Grade Fixed Income, along with a positive correlation with their yields (see Chart 3). Additionally, Commodities have only moderate positive correlations with equity asset classes over a long-term time horizon, which suggests they may add a differentiated source of return to equities as well.
That diversification benefit has become more timely this year. Commodities, as measured by the Bloomberg Commodity Index, have returned 22% year to date1 through August 3, outpacing both the S&P 500 Index and the U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. We upgraded Commodities to favorable on July 16, reflecting our view that supply constraints, geopolitical uncertainty, a potential global oil inventory rebuild, and long-term demand from electrification and technology infrastructure can support the asset class over the next 12 to 18 months.
The recent resurgence of conflict in the Persian Gulf strengthens the “why now” case for Commodities. Global oil markets have faced pressure from geopolitical tensions and supply-chain disruptions, with the Strait of Hormuz remaining an important swing factor for energy markets. Within Commodities, we see particular opportunities in Precious Metals and Industrial Metals, where central-bank reserve demand, inflation-hedging characteristics, electrification, and AI infrastructure investment may help lead the next leg higher.
Chart 3. Commodity prices have increased alongside long-term bond yields
Sources: Bloomberg and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Data from January 2, 2026, through August 3, 2026. Yields represent past performance and fluctuate with market conditions. Current yields may be higher or lower than those quoted above. An Index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
1 Bloomberg, as of August 3, 2026.
Small-mid buyout remains underinvested opportunity
While large buyout deals garner much of the investor attention, we continue to see compelling opportunities in small- and mid-market buyout strategies within private equity. These businesses, typically generating between $10 million and $1 billion in annual revenue, make up roughly 90% of the U.S. private company universe.2 Despite their large presence, they remain an underinvested part of the private equity market.
We believe three structural advantages support the long-term appeal of this segment.
- Less competition: Smaller companies vastly outnumber large businesses, yet only a relatively small share of private equity capital is dedicated to this market. This gives managers a larger opportunity set and allows them to be more selective when making investments.
- Greater opportunities to improve the business: Many of these companies are founder-led or family-owned. Experienced private equity firms can help strengthen operations, professionalize management teams, improve governance, and drive growth initiatives.
- Valuations tend to be lower: Small- and mid-market companies have historically been acquired at lower purchase prices relative to larger businesses. As shown in Chart 4, entry valuations3 for managers with small- and middle-market strategies are generally lower than their larger peers. Moreover, smaller deal values also generally trade at lower valuations, leading to greater potential for value creation over time.
Chart 4. Average entry valuations by manager size and deal value (2015-2020 vintages)
Sources: Pitchbook and Stepstone, based in U.S., as of June 8, 2026. Time frame analyzed includes vintages from 2015 to 2020. *Denotes cohort size smaller than 50 deals. M = millions. B = billions. Valuations multiples are measured by Total Enterprise Value (TEV) divided by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA).
The current environment may further support the opportunity. Private credit lenders continue to provide financing for transactions, and large amounts of uninvested capital, often referred to as "dry powder," are expected to support future deal activity and exits.4 Additionally, smaller debt levels can make these transactions more manageable in a higher-interest-rate environment.
In our view, the combination of structural advantages, improving market conditions, and attractive long-term return potential continues to make small- and mid-market buyout strategies an appealing area of private equity.
Alternative investments, such as hedge funds, private equity, private debt and private real estate funds are not appropriate for all investors and are only open to “accredited” or “qualified” investors within the meaning of U.S. securities laws.
2 Source: Gerber Taylor, “The Role of Private Equity in Portfolios,” Sean Montesi and Kojo McLennon. Data as of October 2021. M = million.
3 Valuations: Measured as Total Enterprise Value (TEV) divided by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). TEV/EBITDA is also known as the Enterprise Multiple and is a common ratio to assess a company’s fair market value that compares a company’s total worth (including equity plus debt minus cash) to its core operating cash flow (EBITDA). Time frame analyzed includes vintages from 2015 to 2020.
4 Pitchbook US PE Breakdown Q2 2026, Citi Executive M&A Summary, First half 2026 edition.
Cash Alternatives and Fixed Income
intentionally blank
intentionally blank
intentionally blank
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
- Developed Market Ex-U.S. Fixed Income
- U.S. Long Term Taxable Fixed Income
|
- Cash Alternatives
- Emerging Market Fixed Income
- High Yield Taxable Fixed Income
- U.S. Intermediate Term Taxable Fixed Income
|
- U.S. Short Term Taxable Fixed Income
|
intentionally blank
|
Equities
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
|
- Developed Market Ex-U.S. Equities
- Emerging Market Equities
- U.S. Mid Cap Equities
|
|
intentionally blank
|
Real Assets
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
intentionally blank
|
- Digital Assets
- Private Real Estate
|
- Commodities
- Private Infrastructure
|
intentionally blank
|
Alternative Investments**
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
intentionally blank
|
- Hedge Funds—Equity Hedge
- Hedge Funds—Macro
- Hedge Funds—Relative Value
- Private Equity
- Private Debt
|
|
intentionally blank
|
Source: Wells Fargo Investment Institute, August 10, 2026. Please see Wells Fargo Investment Institute's Asset Allocation Strategy Report for more detailed, investable ideas in each asset group.
*Tactical horizon is 6-18 months
**Alternative investments are not appropriate for all investors. They are speculative and involve a high degree of risk that is appropriate only for those investors who have the financial sophistication and expertise to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in a fund and for which the fund does not represent a complete investment program. Please see end of report for important definitions and disclosures.