Private equity recovers amid increasing concentration
Private equity markets, including buyouts1 and venture capital2, demonstrated a strong resurgence in deal activity during the fourth quarter of 2025 according to recent data from Pitchbook. This late-year strength pushed full-year deal value up by 31% for buyouts and 59% for venture capital compared to 2024 (Chart 1). The temporary slowdown in the second quarter — likely influenced by the Liberation Day tariff announcement in April — appeared to have had only a short-lived impact3. Overall, the recovery in 2025 seemed to suggest improving confidence among fund managers.
Exit activity, whereby fund managers sell their portfolio companies and return capital to investors, also showed notable improvement. Exit value for both buyouts and venture capital rose by more than 90% year-over-year, supported by increased mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and public listing activity (Chart 1). While the government shutdown in late 2025 likely delayed regulatory reviews for some initial public offerings (IPOs) and pushed them into 20263, the overall trend remains encouraging.
Chart 1. Deal and exit activities grew in 2025 for both buyout and venture capital
Sources: Pitchbook and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Data as of December 31, 2025. For Pitchbook data disclosures, please see page 8.
Despite this growth in dealmaking and exits, fundraising continued to lag in 2025. Venture-capital fundraising declined for the third consecutive year4, while buyout fundraising fell for the second year in a row3.
Additionally, the rebound so far has been uneven and concentrated in certain transaction sizes, sectors, and geographies. Large transactions dominated the market last year and drove a greater increase in deal dollar value than in deal count (Chart 1). In venture capital, AI-related investments accounted for 65% of total deal value (Chart 2), and more than half of newly minted unicorns5 were AI-related companies4. According to Pitchbook, these AI-related firms also secured initial funding earlier and progressed to subsequent funding rounds faster than non-AI companies in 20254. Geographically, over half of first-time AI-related financings occurred in the San Francisco Bay Area.4 On the fundraising side, the largest 30% of funds captured more than 60% of total capital raised, underscoring investors’ preference in established relationships and managers with track records.3
Chart 2. The share of AI-related deals and exits has grown in recent years
Sources: Pitchbook and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Data as of December 31, 2025. For Pitchbook data disclosures, please see page 8. AI = artificial intelligence.
We believe this growing concentration poses potential risks if key technologies or companies fail to meet revenue and earnings expectations. Meanwhile, the pressures to generate cash returns to investors persist as funds hold portfolio companies longer: about 30% of buyout holdings are seven years or older3, and half of unicorns have been held for at least nine years4. We believe exits and deals activities need to broaden out across transaction size, sector and geography to clear this backlog of mature assets.
Until then, secondary market transactions — which allow investors to sell existing fund interests — are likely to remain strong. Secondary transactions seek to provide distributions and return capital back to investors and allow fund managers more time to grow portfolio companies.
Looking ahead, we believe factors such as financing costs, M&A activity, IPO windows, and investor sentiment will play a critical role in shaping the trajectory of private markets in 2026.
1 Buyouts involve acquiring a controlling interest in established companies, often using a mix of equity and debt.
2 Venture capital refers to funding early-stage companies in exchange for equity stakes.
3 “2025 Annual Global PE First Look,” Pitchbook, January 6, 2026.
4 “Q4 2025 Global VC First Look,” Pitchbook, January 7, 2026.
5 Unicorns are startup companies valued at $1 billion or more.
Alternative investments, such as hedge funds, private equity, private debt and private real estate funds are not appropriate for all investors and are only open to “accredited” or “qualified” investors within the meaning of U.S. securities laws.
Power demand benefits across Utilities
As we have written previously6, the U.S. is experiencing its first notable demand increase for electricity in over a decade, with data centers, manufacturing, and broad electrification across the economy serving as the underlying factors. Increased power demand is generally favorable for the Utilities sector considering roughly two-thirds of the sector’s market capitalization is derived from the favorable-rated Electric Utilities sub-industry, another quarter from Multi-Utilities (typically companies with a mix of electric and natural gas operations, rated favorable), and 5% from Independent Power Producers (IPPs) & Energy Traders (also rated favorable). The remaining 5% of the sector is split between Gas Utilities and Water Utilities (rated neutral and unfavorable, respectively), which are generally not driven by power demand.
IPPs tend to show the most direct, short-term sensitivity to electricity demand. Their business model is based on selling power into wholesale markets. Pricing in these markets is a function of supply and demand — as demand rises without an offsetting increase in supply, pricing increases. However, the model can be volatile as fuel-cost fluctuations can lead to swings in margins. So, while there is potential for longer-term upside given the structure, there’s a commensurate amount of volatility that should be expected from IPPs.
Electric Utilities, the vertically integrated variety that own generation, transmission, and distribution assets in a regulated structure, provide a nice mix of power-demand upside with potentially less volatility. Instead of selling power into wholesale markets, vertically integrated utilities (VIUs) generate and sell power from rate-based, regulated assets to their customers. VIUs benefit from increases in power demand, but these benefits tend to show up on a more gradual basis as assets are added to rate base and contribute to the company’s earnings.
Chart 3. Utilities sub-industry performance generally aligns with power exposure
Sources: FactSet and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Data from January 15, 2024 through January 12, 2026.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
6 For more information, see Wells Fargo Investment Institute’s “Sector Insights: Powering the artificial intelligence boom,” August 13, 2025.
Yen struggles despite higher Japanese rates
While most major central banks are still open to cutting rates, the BOJ is moving in the opposite direction. Higher inflation in Japan and newly announced fiscal stimulus suggest rates could continue to rise. While rate hikes in a world of rate cuts should make the returns investors earn from Japanese bonds more attractive, the Japanese yen continues to struggle near multi-decade lows.
Chart 4 shows a rise in rate expectations over the past several months while the yen continues its march downward. Japan’s previously negative or near-zero rates may have explained the yen’s struggles in recent years, but focus seems to have shifted. Political instability and rising government debt have made investors more cautious. When confidence declines, global investors are less willing to hold Japanese assets, which puts downward pressure on the currency through lower demand. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s tenuous grasp on government raises political risks in Japan while rate hikes on top of large sovereign debt raises fiscal ones. These risks have worked their way into Japanese government bonds (JGBs), which have seen yields in longer maturities rise faster than those in shorter maturities7, suggesting higher risks in the long term.
Chart 4. Japanese rates and the yen in recent months
Sources: Bloomberg and Wells Fargo Investment Institute, as of January 13, 2026. BOJ = Bank of Japan. BOJ rates are represented by market pricing of rates following the BOJ’s October 30, 2025 meeting. A higher value for the yen exchange rate implies a weaker yen versus the US dollar.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Higher interest rates could eventually help support the yen — especially if U.S. rate cuts continue into 2026. However, until political stability improves and concerns about government debt ease, these benefits are likely to remain limited. Japanese bond yields may be rising, but they remain well below comparable U.S. yields, a common story for most developed economies. For this reason, we maintain a neutral view on Developed Markets ex-U.S. Fixed Income. Despite the positive returns of developed markets ex-U.S. bonds in 2025, significant weakening for the dollar in 2026 against major developed markets currencies may be difficult.
7 Bloomberg as of January 12, 2026. Spreads between 30-year and 1-year Japanese government bonds stood at 1.88% on January 9, 2025, and were 2.52% as of January 9, 2026.
Gold might be due for a breather
Gold has been a strong performer with the Bloomberg Gold Total Return Index (BCOMGCTR) up 67.79% over a one-year period, as of January 10, 2026. The main cause has been the demand from central banks and retail investors looking to diversify their portfolios beyond stocks and bonds. By extension, this leads to less reliance on financial assets denominated in fiat currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, euro, and yen, which are coming under increasing scrutiny around the world. Another major factor is a renewed rate cut cycle by the Federal Reserve, which tends to lower the opportunity cost of holding gold. Lastly, geopolitical uncertainty remains at high levels, with developments in Venezuela and Iran adding to it in the last week alone.
While some of these factors may lose strength in the coming months, it is hard to see most of them reversing. Still, the recent rally has left gold quite overbought, and we believe a breather is due. We believe investors should take profits and wait for a pullback to add exposure to gold and the favorable-rated Precious Metals sector.
Chart 5 shows the BCOMGCTR Index (4598) is in an uptrend, with the 50-day moving average (4237) now trading above the 200-day moving average (3668). It should find support at the 50-day moving average (4237) point followed by the 200-day moving average (3668). The relative strength index (RSI) in the panel is overbought at a reading of 70, which we believe suggests near-term gains might be harder to come by.
Chart 5. Gold has had quite the run
Sources: Bloomberg and Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Daily data from January 12, 2023, through January 12, 2026. BCOMGCTR = Bloomberg Gold Total Return Index. SMAVG (50) = 50-day simple moving average. SMAVG (200) = 200-day simple moving average. RSI = relative strength index. An index is unmanaged and not available for direct investment.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Cash Alternatives and Fixed Income
intentionally blank
intentionally blank
intentionally blank
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
- U.S. Long Term Taxable Fixed Income
- U.S. Short Term Taxable Fixed Income
|
- Cash Alternatives
- Developed Market Ex-U.S. Fixed Income
- Emerging Market Fixed Income
- High Yield Taxable Fixed Income
|
- U.S. Intermediate Term Taxable Fixed Income
|
intentionally blank
|
Equities
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
|
- Developed Market Ex-U.S. Equities
- Emerging Market Equities
|
- U.S. Large Cap Equities
- U.S. Mid Cap Equities
|
intentionally blank
|
Real Assets
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
intentionally blank
|
- Commodities
- Private Real Estate
|
|
intentionally blank
|
Alternative Investments**
| Most Unfavorable |
Unfavorable |
Neutral |
Favorable |
Most Favorable |
|
intentionally blank
|
intentionally blank
|
- Hedge Funds—Equity Hedge
- Hedge Funds—Macro
- Hedge Funds—Relative Value
- Private Equity
- Private Debt
|
|
intentionally blank
|
Source: Wells Fargo Investment Institute, January 20, 2026.
*Tactical horizon is 6-18 months
**Alternative investments are not appropriate for all investors. They are speculative and involve a high degree of risk that is appropriate only for those investors who have the financial sophistication and expertise to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in a fund and for which the fund does not represent a complete investment program. Please see end of report for important definitions and disclosures.